{"id":75696,"date":"2020-04-01T06:00:47","date_gmt":"2020-04-01T11:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fordhamram.com\/?p=75696"},"modified":"2020-04-01T08:47:03","modified_gmt":"2020-04-01T13:47:03","slug":"collective-accountability-is-necessary-to-reduce-coronavirus-spread","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fordhamram.com\/75696\/opinion\/collective-accountability-is-necessary-to-reduce-coronavirus-spread\/","title":{"rendered":"Collective Accountability is Necessary to Reduce Coronavirus Spread"},"content":{"rendered":"
If nothing else, the current pandemic has offered curious minds much inspiration with which to engage in some interesting thought experiments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Among many other conversations during this self-isolation period <\/span>\u2014<\/span>ranging from the comically nonsensical to the deeply dire <\/span>\u2014<\/span> arose a debate between my mother and me on the relative value of cults.<\/span><\/p>\n To clarify, neither of us advocated for the joining of one. However, the two of us held a healthy discussion that offered serious insights on what it would mean to exist within a group of like-minded individuals holding a shared value system and adhering to common practices.<\/span><\/p>\n My mother took a relatively commonplace approach to the idea of cult life. She argued that the loss of personal agency involved in joining such a community would result in an existence that proves unfulfilling, frustrating and suppressed.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n She said that though touting a group-first mentality, no cult could be truly egalitarian in practice. Hierarchies in power are inevitable, meaning such communities run the risk of bordering on authoritarianism when a figure does step up to lead them. Ultimately, she said, participating in a cult involves the inherent loss of individuality, making life under such a framework simply unenjoyable.<\/span><\/p>\n Having recently watched \u201cMidsommar,\u201d the acclaimed 2019 film by Ari Aster, and having an otherwise less traditional outlook overall, my ideas of collective life looked a bit liberal in comparison to my mother\u2019s. I argued that <\/span>\u2014 <\/span>contrary to how it might appear on the surface <\/span>\u2014<\/span> perhaps dedicated, community-oriented living would actually prove freeing in its inherent sense of connectedness.<\/span><\/p>\n Through the unity of individual life and a deep understanding of humanity as a universal experience, we actually realize that what we are feeling is not so alienating after all. Even if our emotions do prove singular in origin, a sense of togetherness might allow us to feel seen in our expression of them.<\/span><\/p>\n In fact, in \u201cMidsommar,\u201d members of the community at H\u00e5rga actively grieve with the main character Dani by crying, wailing and otherwise joining in her darkest moments. Despite not relating to the source of her sadness, the community members support Dani by intimately connecting to her expression of it, signaling their recognition of the feeling, as well.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Such scenes can be as cathartic for open-minded viewers as they might have been for the afflicted character. They also argue that a strong prioritization of collective identity <\/span>\u2014<\/span> shown through this act of joint mourning <\/span>\u2014<\/span> might actually embolden our individual understanding of self.<\/span><\/p>\n Maybe it is only through a deep recognition of how we as singular beings play into the larger, collective picture that we are able to grapple with our most uncomfortable feelings.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n We ended the discussion on the simple, and perhaps obvious, conclusion that cults are flawed in many respects. However, the tenets of collectivism offer a lot of valuable insight, particularly to American citizens, as we navigate the profoundly unsettling circumstances we now find ourselves a part of.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n We are existing through a collective moment unprecedented in modern history.<\/span><\/p>\n Even problems that have affected entire states, countries or continents have proved unable to uproot as much of understood societal interplay as COVID-19 has in just a few short months. The ideological conversation of collectivism versus individualism is one that matters now more than ever for this very reason.<\/span><\/p>\n As Americans <\/span>struggle to contain the spread of COVID-19<\/span><\/a> and flatten the infection-rate curve in our nation, these circumstances call into question the sociocultural factors that have impacted our approach toward the virus so far.<\/span><\/p>\n American society\u2019s general inclination toward the protection of personal agency <\/span>\u2014<\/span>bolstered by long-promoted rhetoric of individualism and meritocracy <\/span>\u2014<\/span> has <\/span>prevented a lot of citizens from listening to the self-isolation advice of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. People have continued to visit friends or crowd public areas, such as parks or <\/span>boardwalks<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n