• About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • FTC Disclosure
Monday, June 16, 2025
  • Login
The Fordham Ram
  • Home
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Fashion
    • Film And Television
    • Food
    • Music
    • Review
    • Television
    • Theatre
    • Who’s That Kid
  • News
    • Academics
    • Admissions
    • Faculty & Administrative
    • Feature
    • Finance
    • Metro
    • USG
  • Opinion
    • Columnists
    • Editorial
    • From The Desk
    • Letters To The Editor
    • Op-Ed
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
    • Football
    • Rowing
    • Senior Profile
    • Soccer
    • Softball
    • Squash
    • Swimming And Diving
    • Tennis
    • Track And Field
    • Volleyball
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Fashion
    • Film And Television
    • Food
    • Music
    • Review
    • Television
    • Theatre
    • Who’s That Kid
  • News
    • Academics
    • Admissions
    • Faculty & Administrative
    • Feature
    • Finance
    • Metro
    • USG
  • Opinion
    • Columnists
    • Editorial
    • From The Desk
    • Letters To The Editor
    • Op-Ed
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
    • Football
    • Rowing
    • Senior Profile
    • Soccer
    • Softball
    • Squash
    • Swimming And Diving
    • Tennis
    • Track And Field
    • Volleyball
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
The Fordham Ram
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

YouTube Restriction Gone Haywire

The Fordham Ram by The Fordham Ram
January 21, 2021
in Opinion
0
YouTube Restriction Gone Haywire
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Reddit

Over a week ago, YouTube implemented a new feature to its website: a new Restriction Mode for parents who want a safer content experience for their children.  Normally, this addition would be innocuous, and even welcomed.  Being able to restrict videos due to levels of violence, nudity and strong language is an incredibly useful tool for the modern parent.

However, YouTube went a step further, creating an algorithm that automatically bans videos with certain keywords in the description, so long as the Restricted Mode option is activated.  At first glance, the algorithm is fully functional, blocking most questionable content once the mode is activated.  But some YouTubers noticed that the algorithm was blocking more content than most of the public was aware of.  Thousands of videos containing LGBTQ+ content were now inaccessible to those who were using a restricted YouTube account.

The optimistic reader might assume that YouTube’s algorithm was only restricting overtly sexual LGBTQ+ content, which would be par for the course for any kind of restrictions set for children.  A few famous YouTubers, particularly those who are part of the LGBTQ+ community, tested this theory, searching for previous videos they or their friends made that only contained themes of homosexuality.  Their search concluded that any video with “gay,” “LGBTQ” or any queer indicator deemed it restricted.  Unfortunately, it appears that the sexual nature of the video is irrelevant. Tyler Oakley, famous YouTuber and icon for the gay community, points out that a video he made about inspirational black LGBTQ+ trendsetters was restricted under this mode.  Other videos include marriage proposals between two people of the same gender, music videos featuring lesbian duo Tegan and Sara, transgender makeup tutorials and famous “coming out” videos.

What message is this sending to our children?  Understandably, there are YouTube videos that discuss mature topics within the LGBTQ+ community, but a video should not be categorized as inappropriate because it is labelled “gay,” “LGBTQ” or any of the aforementioned terms.  The idea that the LGBTQ+ community is associated with strictly sexual and mature topics is a negative stigma that has continued for too long, preventing kids from understanding that it is acceptable to identify as LGBTQ.

Though YouTube has apologized via Twitter for the video restrictions, it has done nothing to rectify the problem to date.  The previously mentioned videos are still blocked under Restricted Mode, even though they do not contain any harmful material. Whether inadvertently or not, YouTube is saying that it finds LGBTQ+ content inappropriate for children, which is already a toxic opinion that too many people agree with.  In the past, YouTube was a safe space for the LGBTQ+ community to gather.  This outlet is essential and provides children in this community a place to express themselves.

This is where the concept of blocking LGBTQ+ content becomes damaging to the children of today and tomorrow.  Young people, especially teenagers, can often feel isolated, believing there is an unseen line separating them from others.  Adding this to the stress of being an LGBTQ+ youth creates a potentially dangerous situation.  By removing all LGBTQ+ content, we create a stigma that being LGBTQ+ is not acceptable.  Hiding these themes from children will not diminish their sexuality. I believe YouTube’s implementation of this option does a disservice to the LGBTQ+ community.  YouTubers represent a diverse spectrum of sexualities and gender identities, and watching the right video may be inspirational, encouraging or even life-saving.

Of course, there are those that will argue that some children are too young to watch LGBTQ+ videos because they cannot yet be properly taught concepts like sexuality.  I say this argument is invalid for two reasons.  Firstly, if your child is of school age, they are not too young to learn about homosexual and transgender themes; in fact, they most likely have already been exposed to them in some way or another.  If your child is under the age of reasoning, I agree that it can be challenging to explain such topics.  But a new issue is now present: why would a parent allow their toddler unsupervised access to the internet, specifically YouTube?

If you feel your child is too young to understand the concept of sexuality, then they are most definitely too young to be allowed internet access with no adult supervision.  Parents that actively choose to keep their children ignorant of LGBTQ+ concepts have to accept the fact that they are potentially damaging their child irreparably.  The internet is a vast well. Hopefully, YouTube will continue to provide the LGBTQ+ community with the platform it needs to support all its

 

Briana Scalia, FCRH ’20, is a broadcast journalism major from Long Island, New York.

 

Tags: briana scaliaOpinionyoutube
Previous Post

When Golden State Doesn’t Glitter

Next Post

A Further Look into Adjunct Wages

Next Post
A Further Look into Adjunct Wages

A Further Look into Adjunct Wages

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Best FREE Online Sewing Classes & Courses

Start Sewing Now: 14 Free Online Sewing Classes

2 years ago
Goulding Continues to Enchant

Goulding Continues to Enchant

4 years ago

Popular News

  • Google Kills off Major Fitbit Functionality

    Google Kills off Major Fitbit Functionality

    3 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Top FREE Best Online Singing Courses and Classes

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Learning from Nahko Bear

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Free Online Bookkeeping Courses With Certificates

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Track a Phone Without a SIM Card: Is It Possible?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Connect with us

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • FTC Disclosure

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Books
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Fashion
    • Film And Television
    • Food
    • Music
    • Review
    • Television
    • Theatre
    • Who’s That Kid
  • News
    • Academics
    • Admissions
    • Faculty & Administrative
    • Feature
    • Finance
    • Metro
    • USG
  • Opinion
    • Columnists
    • Editorial
    • From The Desk
    • Letters To The Editor
    • Op-Ed
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
    • Football
    • Rowing
    • Senior Profile
    • Soccer
    • Softball
    • Squash
    • Swimming And Diving
    • Tennis
    • Track And Field
    • Volleyball
  • About Us

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.